Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah terhadap Peningkatan Kualitas Pendidikan dan Kinerja Institusi di Sekolah Dasar

Penulis

  • Deri Nopita Sari SDIT Darussalam Palembang Author

Kata Kunci:

Kepemimpinan Utama, Peningkatan Kualitas Sekolah, Kepemimpinan Transformatif dan Partisipatif, Kepemimpinan Pendidikan Islam

Abstrak

Tujuan studi ini adalah untuk mengkaji bagaimana kepemimpinan kepala sekolah berkontribusi dalam meningkatkan kualitas sekolah, dengan penekanan pada bagaimana administrasi, komunikasi, dan teknik kepemimpinan memengaruhi hasil akademik secara keseluruhan. Di SDIT Darussalam Palembang, Sumatera Selatan, Indonesia, data dikumpulkan melalui observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi sebagai bagian dari metodologi deskriptif kualitatif. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa peningkatan kinerja guru, prestasi siswa, dan budaya organisasi sekolah secara signifikan dipengaruhi oleh kepemimpinan visioner kepala sekolah, komunikasi yang efektif, dan manajemen yang kooperatif. Studi ini menawarkan pemahaman kontekstual tentang kepemimpinan di sekolah Islam dengan menggabungkan nilai-nilai kepemimpinan berbasis Islam dengan teknik manajemen pendidikan kontemporer. Implikasi praktisnya adalah agar dapat mengembangkan kerja sama tim yang kuat dan mendorong perbaikan berkelanjutan, kepala sekolah sebaiknya mengadopsi gaya kepemimpinan transformasional dan partisipatif. Dengan menyediakan model kepemimpinan efektif yang dapat dijadikan panduan bagi lembaga pendidikan lain yang ingin meningkatkan kualitas sekolah melalui praktik kepemimpinan strategis, studi ini menambah pengetahuan dalam bidang ini.

Referensi

Ajani, Y. A., Oladokun, B. D., Olarongbe, S. A., Amaechi, M. N., Rabiu, N., & Bashorun, M. T. (2024). Revitalizing indigenous knowledge systems via digital media technologies for sustainability of indigenous languages. Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture, 53(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2023-0051

Akramy, S. A. (2020). Speaking anxiety in an Afghan EFL setting: A case study of an Afghan university. Language in India, 20(12), 161–182.

Alves, I., Campos Pinto, P., & Pinto, T. J. (2020). Developing inclusive education in Portugal: Evidence and challenges. Prospects, 49(3–4), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09504-y

Amirah, B., & Saidalvi, A. (2023). Talking story: Ebooks to improve reading comprehension skills. In Embracing change: Emancipating the landscape of research in linguistics, language and literature (pp. 259–271). International Conference of Research on Language Education 2023. https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/82014/

Arhire, M. (2023). Multilingualism in the Romanian translation of C. N. Adichie’s Purple Hibiscus: Sociolinguistic considerations. Open Linguistics, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2022-0255

Ceballos, M., Buckridge, H., & Taylor, R. T. (2020). Educational leadership students and mixed reality experiences: Building student confidence to communicate with parents and teachers. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 15(1), 58–71.

Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies. School Leadership & Management, 36(2), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2016.1158633

Eriana, E. S., & Zein, D. A. (2023). Artificial intelligence. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 1.

Gronn, P. (2000). Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 28(3), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X000283006

Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A legacy of effective schools research. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143205052153

Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699

Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X96032001002

Harris, A. (2004). Distributed leadership and school improvement: Leading or misleading? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 32(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X04037250

HASHEMİ, A. (2021). The effects of using games on teaching vocabulary in reading comprehension: A case of gifted students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 9(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.846480

Herdina, G. F., & Ningrum, A. S. B. (2023). Teachers’ perceptions and challenges in integrating technology in English reading course: A systematic research review. English Education: Journal of English Teaching and Research, 8(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v8i1.19133

Ida Royani, & Sihombing, M. R. (2024). ChatGPT in the academic writing classroom. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 7(2), 630–638. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v7i2.15615

Jajuli, J., Wahidin, K., & Fahrudin, A. (2022). Developing the quality of traditional Islamic boarding school using the total quality management model. Asian Social Work Journal, 7(6), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.47405/aswj.v7i6.236

Keeley, L., Pikkel, R., Quinn, B., & Walters, H. (2019). Ten types of innovation. Wiley.

Kholid, M. N., Rofi’ah, F., Ishartono, N., Waluyo, M., Maharani, S., Swastika, A., Faiziyah, N., & Sari, C. K. (2022). What are students’ difficulties in implementing mathematical literacy skills for solving PISA-like problem? Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(2), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i2.5057

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1999). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 37(2), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578239910268837

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565829

Linder, R., & Falk-Ross, F. (2024). Multimodal resources and approaches for teaching young adolescents: A review of the literature. Education Sciences, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14091010

Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X03253412

Marks, H. M., & Seashore Louis, K. (1999). Professional community in improving schools: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 715–750.

Papadakis, S., Kanadlı, S., Kardaş, A., Tülübaş, T., Karakoşe, T., & Polat, H. (2024). Investigating the relationship between leadership for learning and student achievement through the mediation of teacher performance: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM) approach. Education Sciences, 14(12), Article 1320. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121320

Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509

Rojabi, A. R. (2021). EFL learners’ perceptions on Schoology use in the reading class. VELES: Voices of English Language Education Society, 5(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v5i1.3219

Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030003023

Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2015). Direction-setting school leadership practices: A meta-analytic review of evidence about their influence. School Leadership & Management, 35(5), 455–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2015.1032463

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C. R. (2015). Principals, trust, and cultivating vibrant schools. Societies, 5(2), 256–276. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc5020256

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1

Zou, B., Du, Y., Wang, Z., Chen, J., & Zhang, W. (2023). An investigation into artificial intelligence speech evaluation programs with automatic feedback for developing EFL learners’ speaking skills. SAGE Open, 13(3), 21582440231193816. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231193818

Zusniarni, Z., Nazurty, N., & Sukendro, S. (2024). Pengembangan LKPD berbasis project-based learning (PjBL) pada muatan IPAS untuk meningkatkan efektivitas pembelajaran peserta didik kelas IV MI Darussalam Kota Jambi. Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education, 5(2), 1170–1177. https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v5i2.2766

Diterbitkan

2026-03-04